Drawn Box
Teardown · Rubric v1
Rejection teardownsMarketing manager → senior demand gen · 6 years

A marketing manager resume, rejected for helping

Every bullet on this resume is true and every bullet describes someone standing next to the work. The posting asked who owned the number.

The resume is a composite we wrote. No real person, no client, no consent to worry about. Everything below the resume is unedited output from the screen a visitor gets, run against Rubric v1 and the posting named here.

Screened against

Senior Demand Generation Manager, Cobalt Loom

What the screen saw first
Marketing Manager helping growing B2B companies build brand awareness and reach new audiences.

EXPERIENCE

Marketing Manager, Vantage Point Media — Austin, TX
January 2022 to Present
- Supported the demand gen team with campaign copy and creative briefs for paid social, working from the media buyer's channel plan
- Helped launch a new email nurture sequence for trial signups in partnership with the growth team and the lifecycle lead
- Assisted with quarterly planning for the paid search budget alongside the media buyer and finance
- Partnered with sales development on lead scoring criteria for the new CRM fields, sitting in on their weekly sync
- Helped coordinate two webinars per quarter with the content team, handling registration pages and reminder emails
- Supported the rebrand rollout across the website, email templates, and sales collateral over a six-month project
- Assisted the CMO with slide decks for board updates on marketing performance each quarter
- Helped train two new marketing coordinators on the campaign brief process after the team grew

The resume continues for two more roles. The screen did not.

The verdict

REJECT

A screener stopped here. 6 seconds in.

The stop line
Marketing Manager helping growing B2B companies build brand awareness and reach new audiences.

Quoted verbatim. Never edited, never trimmed silently.

3 reasons
  1. Criterion 8 — Scope and ownership

    The posting requires direct ownership of a pipeline number. Every bullet across three roles describes participation, not ownership. The additional section even admits this explicitly.

    Supported the demand gen team with campaign copy and creative briefs for paid social, working from the media buyer's channel plan

  2. Criterion 7 — Seniority signal

    The posting is a senior role requiring ownership language. The resume uses subordinate language throughout every role and every bullet without exception.

    Assisted the CMO with slide decks for board updates on marketing performance each quarter

  3. Criterion 3 — Requirement match

    The posting requires a specific pipeline or MQL number owned for at least two consecutive quarters. No such number appears anywhere on the resume.

    Looking to grow into a role with more direct ownership of a number rather than supporting someone else's.

What to change, worst first
  1. 1Cut every helped, assisted, supported and partnered where you did not own the outcome. If the verb cannot become owned, ran or built, cut the bullet.
  2. 2Add a pipeline or MQL number you owned, the quarter range, and whether you hit it. Without it the resume fails the posting's first requirement.
  3. 3Rewrite the opening line to state a result you produced, a channel you ran, and a scale. Replace the brand-awareness sentence with one outcome you caused.
One line of the rewrite

This is what the paid half does, on the line that lost the interview.

Original · Opening line

Marketing Manager helping growing B2B companies build brand awareness and reach new audiences.

Rewritten

Marketing Manager with 6 years in B2B demand generation, paid channels, and pipeline reporting. [Add your owned pipeline or MQL number and the quarters you hit it here before submitting.]

Why: The posting requires someone who owns a pipeline number. The original headline signals a supporting role with no ownership claim.

A bracketed prompt means we will not invent a number the resume does not contain. The rest of the rewrite, and 5 more verdicts, is the Fix at $29.

This is the most common rejection we see. Collaborative language reads as generous in a performance review and as junior on a resume.

Get your free verdict

One resume, one posting. Free, and no payment before you have read it.

More teardowns

No score. No percentage. No human read this resume — our screen did. This verdict is also live at the page a candidate would see.